Settlement: Ameriprise Agrees Preliminary Settlement In Securities America Investor Class Action

Home > Settlements > Ameriprise Agrees Preliminary Settlement in Securities America Investor Class Action Ameriprise Agrees Preliminary Settlement in Securities America Investor Class Action April 13 2011 New York, NY: A preliminary settlement has been reached by Ameriprise Financial and its brokerage unit, Securities America Inc, and clients who allege in they lost roughly $400 million on fraudulent private placements. The preliminary agreement would see Securities America pay $80 million, further to a separate agreement in which SA has agreed to pay $70 million. If approved, the settlement would mean a recovery of 40 cents on the dollar, after fees. If approved, the majority of the settlement will be paid by Ameriprise. Legal Help If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please fill in the form to the right. Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/ameriprise-agrees-preliminary-settlement-in.html?ref=rss

Law Suit Filed: Nevada Foreclosure Companies Face Illegal Debt Collection Class Action

What are you looking for? Home Page >> Lawsuits Filed >> Lawsuit: Nevada Foreclosure Companies Face Illegal Debt Collection Class Action Nevada Foreclosure Companies Face Illegal Debt Collection Class Action Please click here for a free evaluation of your claim Las Vegas, NV: A foreclosure class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of 16 Nevadans against five companies hired by banks and lenders to handle the foreclosures on properties owned by the plaintiffs and one additional defendant who purchased property through the foreclosure process. The lawsuit claims illegal debt collection activities and deceptive trade practices by the defendants against the plaintiffs during the foreclosure process as the defendants were not licensed or registered in the State of Nevada to carry out the foreclosure process. The plaintiffs are Nevadans who not only lost their houses in one of the hardest hit real estate markets, but were also adversely affected by foreclosure companies that did not follow the law during the foreclosure process. The lawsuit names as defendants: Quality Loan Service Corporation; Appleton Properties, LLC; MTC Financial, Inc. dba Trustee Corps; Meridian Foreclosure Service dba MTDS, Inc. dba Meridian Trust Deed Service; National Default Servicing Corporation; and California Reconveyance Company. The lawsuit seeks to compensate the plaintiffs and compel the defendants to surrender all fees collected for many thousands of foreclosures during the time they were operating illegally. The case was filed as a class action lawsuit because there are thousands of potential plaintiffs who were victims of these foreclosure companies. The lawsuit alleges that the debt collection activities of the defendants are and/or were illegal and improper because each of the defendants did not hold a license to engage in debt collection activities in the State of Nevada and each also failed to register as a foreign debt collection agency with the Nevada Financial Institutions Division. The illegal and improper debt collection activities include the issuance of debt-related notices, demands, collection communications and/or foreclosure sales and processes. In addition, the plaintiffs also claim deceptive trade practices, consumer fraud, unjust enrichment, trespass, quiet title and in two instances, elder abuse. Plaintiffs are asking for compensatory and consequential damages in excess to $10,000, disgorgement of any amounts paid to defendants for their respective http://cortrightlaw.com/location/orange attorney-attorney-office illegal and improper debt collection activities, attorney's fees and injunctive relief. Nevada Illegal Foreclosure Class Action Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered damages in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/nevada-foreclosure-companies-class-action-illegal.html?ref=rss

Settlement: Historic $10M Settlement Reached in Debt Collection Class Action

Home > Settlements > Historic $10M Settlement Reached in Debt Collection Class Action Historic $10M Settlement Reached in Debt Collection Class Action September 12 2011 Greenville, SC: Thousands of people have been forgiven their debts in a historical unfair business class action settlement web link reached Friday in Maryland. The class action lawsuit was brought by Jason Hauk and Freddy Velazquez who led the class action suit, against LVNV Funding LLC, a Greenville, SC-based company that buys consumer debt. According to the terms of the settlement some 3,500 people in the class will receive about $2000 each, for a total of $7 million. The total settlement forgives about $10 million in debt, according to filings in U.S. District Court in Baltimore. Further, LVNV will not pursue the 3,500 debtors in order to collect the debt, nor will they be able to sell those debts to other third party collection agencies. And LVNV have to remove information it gave to the major credit bureaus for each of those debtors, a step taken to improve their credit ratings. The settlement is being hailed as historic, and a major win for the class. Legal Help If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please fill in the form to the right. Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/debt-collection-class-action-law.html?ref=rss

Protesters target Orange County Animal Services after recent mistakes

AN UPROAR OVER TREATMENT OF ANIMALS HAS IGNITED A PROTEST AIMED AT ORANGE COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES. THEY POINT TO SERIOUS PROBLEMS AT AN AGENCY WHICH HANDLES MORE THAN 16,000 DOGS AND CATS EACH YEAR. THE COMPLAINTS RANGE FROM ANIMALS ACCIDENTALLY EUTHANIZED TO ANOTHER DOG MAIMED BY A GROOMER. PROTESTERS ALSO HAVE COMPLAINTS ABOUT AT LEAST ONE STAFF VETERINARIAN. GREG FOX IS LIVE AT THE ORANGE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING WHERE LEADERS OUTLINED A ROAD MAP TO EXPOSE PROBLEMS AND RECOMMEND CHANGES. PLENTY OF FOLKS DEMANDING THE PROBLEMS BE FIXED. IT WAS A FULL COMMISSION MEETING. CERTAINLY THERE ARE A GREAT MANY PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY WHO ARE PASSIONATE ABOUT ANIMAL CARE AND EQUALLY PASSIONATE ABOUT THE CARE PROVIDED BY THE SHELTER RUN UNDER THE ANIMAL SERVICES OF ORANGE COUNTY. THEY LET COMMISSIONERS KNOW THAT TODAY. TODAY COUNTY LEADERS PROMISED A TOP TO BOTTOM REVIEW AND FIRM SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS THEY FIND.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.wesh.com/news/central-florida/Orange Attorney-county/protesters-target-orange-county-animal-services-after-recent-mistakes/-/12978032/21671558/-/1fs84g/-/index.html

Orange County rallies for change

and throw me a Good 'N Plenty." Tamra says she thinks their relationship seemed staged. "It's not all peaches and cream in the Bellino home," Alexis admits. No ... it's all Good 'N Plenty, apparently, the very worst candy in the world. (Personal bias). Andy then turns to Tamra, and brings up the subject of her long-delayed nuptials to her fiance Eddie with a quippy, "The Latin heat turned to cold feet." We flashback to Tamra orchestrating her wedding pretty much against Eddie's will, forcing him to choose a date, picking out the rings herself, being given carte blanche with the wedding planner, etc. But according to several promos for "Tamra's OC Wedding," the two did indeed tie the knot!
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.huffingtonpost.com/heather-wagner/the-real-housewives-of-Orange Attorney-county-recap-reunion-part-3_b_3820404.html

'The Real Housewives of Orange County' Recap: Reunion Part 3

Working out is great therapy and clears your head. Owning CUT Fitness and being there every day gives me the chance to jump into different classes all day long. My diet changed about two years ago. I eat only clean and healthy, and I juice with Nekter cleanse often. Your diet is a huge part of your results. There was plenty of drama this season on The Real Housewives of Orange County. How do you handle it? I try not to bring it home with me. I treat it as a job. I just keep reminding myself, If there was no drama, none of us would have a job. Sometimes, I get sick of it, and I need to regroup.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.southflorida.com/events/on-the-list-blog/sf-orange-county-special-meet-tamra-barney-judge-friday-in-fort-lauderdale-20130827,0,5202505.story

'Orange County' special: Meet Tamra Barney Judge Friday in Fort Lauderdale

The changes follow a U.S. Supreme Court decision in June that struck down Section 4 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The law enforced voter equality by requiring states with a history of racial bias to get the federal governments approval of any voting law changes. The law applied to 40 of North Carolinas 100 counties. Republicans said the law would prevent voter fraud and restore faith in elections. It closed a historic legislative session when the party controlled both houses and the governors mansion for the first time in more than a century.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.newsobserver.com/2013/08/29/3146505/Orange Attorney-county-rallies-for-change.html

Does Orange County owe you money? How to find out

Does Orange County owe you money? How to find out Last Updated: Thursday, August 29, 2013, 12:00 http://cortrightlaw.com/location/orange-attorney-office AM More Info Orange County unclaimed checks site ORLANDO -- There is lots of unclaimed money floating around the Orange County Clerk of Courts, but the deadline to claim it is coming up very fast. The deadline to contact the clerks office to claim the money is Sept. 1, but Sept. 1 is a Sunday this year. If you don't do it by 4 p.m. this Friday, there's a possibility you could end up forfeiting it. So who is on the list of people who can claim checks? The list is on the Unclaimed Checks page, which is alphabetical by your first name, not your last. Most of the names seem to be local residents, and several are owed big bucks. There are individual residents who are owed money, but also law firms, Bank of America, the Florida Dept.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.baynews9.com/content/news/baynews9/news/article.html/content/news/articles/cfn/2013/8/28/does_Orange Attorney_county_o.html

Law Suit Filed: Saxon Mortgage Faces Class Action Over Alleged Illegal Use of HAMP

Home > Lawsuits > Saxon Mortgage Faces Class Action Over Alleged Illegal Use of HAMP Saxon Mortgage Faces Class Action Over Alleged Illegal Use of HAMP April 7 2011 San Francisco, CA: Saxon Mortgage Inc, the mortgage service division of Morgan Stanley, is facing a a potential class action lawsuit alleging that the company uses the Homeowners Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) to attract customers into making "trial" payments on loans it has no intention of ever permanently modifying. Filed in Northern California, the suit, titled Gaudin v. Saxon Mortgage Services Inc, alleges a pattern of misconduct by Saxon of collecting trial payments, delaying the processing of loan modifications, and then denying the application altogether for demonstrably false reasons. According to the suit, Marie Gaudin, lead plaintiff and owner of a San Francisco bridal boutique that suffered hard times as a result of the recession brought on by the sub-prime mortgage crisis, asked Saxon for loan modification on her home. Gaudin was directed to Saxon's "Home Preservation Department" and subsequently asked to provide extensive documentation of her financial condition, which she did. She was assured by Saxon that they were "committed to assisting you in any way we can to complete the [the loan modification]. We want to help!" She received a written agreement from them that appeared to promise a permanent HAMP loan modification after she made three "trial" payments as proof she could handle the loan repayments. The complaint notes that Saxon instead delayed the processing of the HAMP loan modification, while urging Gaudin to continue making trial payments. However, after receiving numerous trial payments and fulfilling the rest of her obligations under http://cortrightlaw.com/location/orange attorney-attorney-office the agreement Saxon denied her a permanent HAMP modification. They falsely claimed that Gaudin had failed to make payments or comply with document requests. Saxon's correspondence with Gaudin shows a pattern of inaccurate and irresponsible behavior on the part of a major global bank. The company claimed that she did not make payments, while in the same letter actually acknowledged that she was current on all payments. It also claimed that the U.S. Treasury Department was involved in reviewing HAMP applications. The class action alleges that Saxon's breach of contract, rescission and restitution, deceptive debt collection practices violated California's Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Rosenthal Act) and fraudulent, unlawful, and unfair business practices under California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL). Saxon Mortgage HAMP Class Action Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered damages in this case, please fill in the form to the right and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation. Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/saxon-mortgage-faces-class-action-illegal-use-of.html?ref=rss

Settlement: Bank of America Reaches $500M Settlement

Home > Settlements > Bank of America Reaches $500M Settlement Bank of America Reaches $500M Settlement April 17 2013 New York, NY: Bank of America has reached a settlement in the pending securities fraud class action lawsuit brought by investors who purchased mortgage investments from Countrywide Financial. BoFA acquired Countrywide in 2008. The proposed settlement would see BoFA pay $500 million to settle the lawsuit, which would be paid out to plaintiffs that include Dubai's Mashreq Bank and public and union pension funds in California, source Maine, Nevada, Vermont and Washington states. The plaintiffs claimed they were misled about the risks of securities they bought from California-based Countrywide between 2005 and 2007. The settlement surpasses the $315 million accord reached with Merrill Lynch in May 2012, making it the largest to resolve federal class-action litigation over mortgage-backed securities since the financial crisis began. The accord requires court approval. Legal Help If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please click the link below. Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/bank-of-america-reaches-500m-settlement-countrywide.html?ref=rss

Settlement: Historic $10M Settlement Reached in Debt Collection Class Action

Home > Settlements > Historic $10M Settlement Reached in Debt Collection Class Action Historic $10M Settlement Reached in Debt Collection Class Action September 12 2011 Greenville, SC: Thousands of people have been forgiven their debts in a historical unfair business class action settlement reached Friday in Maryland. The class action lawsuit was brought by Jason Hauk and Freddy Velazquez who led the class action suit, against LVNV Funding LLC, a Greenville, SC-based company that buys consumer debt. According to the terms of the settlement some 3,500 people in the class will receive about $2000 each, for a total of $7 million. The total settlement forgives about $10 million in debt, according to filings in U.S. District Court in Baltimore. Further, LVNV will not pursue the 3,500 debtors in order to collect the debt, nor will they be able to sell those debts to other third party collection agencies. And LVNV have to remove information it gave to the major credit bureaus for each of those debtors, a step taken to improve their credit ratings. The settlement is being hailed as historic, and a major win for the class. Legal Help If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please fill in the form to the right. Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/debt-collection-class-action-law.html?ref=rss

877 20-SOLAR Offers Affordable Orange County Solar Energy Solutions

BJ's Restaurants Opens in Orange, California

The Solar Center is Orange County solar! Backed by a solid reputation as one of the areas leading solar experts, they know the product, they know the environment; they know Orange County! Solar Center is one of a select group of Orange County solar power distributors who can offer the highest efficiency solar panels on the market manufactured by SunPower. With SunPower, The Solar Center can tailor a solar panel installation to specific needs and lifestyles, so homeowners and businesses experience maximum Orange County solar energy performance without a maximum investment. Plus, our experienced service and craftsmanship meets the highest of standards set by the AAMA (The American Architectural Manufacturers Association). Solar Centers professionals pride themselves in Orange County Solar energy installation, leaving satisfied customers with an investment and enjoying a lifetime of savings. The Solar Center is offering free consultation and quotations with no obligation for purchase. Solar Center takes pride in offering such benefits as zero money down, rebates, Orange County solar lease programs, and responsive professionals who listen to customers needs. Just call 877-20 SOLAR today to reach the Orange County area Go Solar Center.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.wfsb.com/story/23246037/877-20-solar-offers-affordable-Orange Attorney-county-solar-energy-solutions

Rodent Guys exterminates gophers with several pest control techniques for Anaheim and Orange. They use both traditional baiting methods and pet-friendly, non-poison techniques. They prefer not to use poison because the non-poison techniques work better than bait and pose no danger to wildlife or household pets. Rodent Guys Gopher Extermination service offers a 60-day guarantee for Anaheim and Orange, CA gopher eradication services. This makes it the longest guarantee for gopher and mole pest control service in Southern California. Rodent Guys is licensed by the State of California and insured for performing pest control services in Anaheim and Orange, CA. For more information about Rodent Guys Gopher Extermination Service for Anaheim and Orange, California, visit their website at http://www.rodentguys.com or call them at 866-931-1287 for Los Angeles, Ventura, San Bernardino, Orange and Riverside Counties.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.streetinsider.com/Press+Releases/Orange+and+Anaheim%2C+CA+Gopher+Control+Now+Available+with+60-Day+Guarantee/8613424.html

Orange and Anaheim, CA Gopher Control Now Available with 60-Day Guarantee

Certain statements in the preceding paragraphs and all other statements that are not purely historical constitute "forward-looking" statements for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, http://www.socallawsupport.com/ and are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby. Such statements include, but are not limited to, those regarding expected comparable restaurant sales and margin growth in future periods, total potential domestic capacity, the success of various sales-building and productivity initiatives, future guest traffic trends and the number and timing of new restaurants expected to be opened in future periods. These "forward-looking" statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results to be materially different from those projected or anticipated. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to: (i) our ability to manage an increasing number of new restaurant openings, (ii) construction delays, (iii) labor shortages, (iv) increase in minimum wage and other employment related costs, including the potential impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on our operations, (v) the effect of credit and equity market disruptions on our ability to finance our continued expansion on acceptable terms, (vi) food quality and health concerns, (vii) factors that impact California, where 62 of our current 136 restaurants are located, (viii) restaurant and brewery industry competition, (ix) impact of certain brewery business considerations, including without limitation, dependence upon suppliers, third party contractors and related hazards, (x) consumer spending trends in general for casual dining occasions, (xi) potential uninsured losses and liabilities due to limitations on insurance coverage, (xii) fluctuating commodity costs and availability of food in general and certain raw materials related to the brewing of our handcrafted beers and energy, (xiii) trademark and service-mark risks, (xiv) government regulations and licensing costs, (xv) beer and liquor regulations, (xvi) loss of key personnel, (xvii) inability to secure acceptable sites, (xviii) legal proceedings, (xix) other general economic and regulatory conditions and requirements, (xx) the success of our key sales-building and related operational initiatives, and (xxi) numerous other matters discussed in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its recent reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K. The "forward-looking" statements contained in this press release are based on current assumptions and expectations and BJ's Restaurants, Inc. undertakes no obligation to update or alter its "forward-looking" statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. For further information, please contact Greg Levin of BJ's Restaurants, Inc. at (714) 500-2400.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.marketwatch.com/story/bjs-restaurants-opens-in-Orange Attorney-california-2013-07-30

California United Bank Opens New Irvine Office

California's citrus industry ranks second in the U.S. after Florida, according to USDA. California produced about 33% of the nation's total citrus, including 80% of the nation's fresh Orange Attorneys. The only effective way to stop HLB is to take down the tree, which can't be replanted as long as the disease remains in the area. In Florida, growers have had to pull 200,000 acres worth of Orange Attorney and other citrus trees and totally abandon up to 60,000, Nelsen said. "The same thing's going on in Mexico and Brazil." Thus far the best hope for controlling the spread of the psyllids has been the introduction of tiny parasitic wasp called Tamarixia that attacks the psyllids just after they hatch. Mark Hoddle directs the Center for Invasive Species Research at the University of California-Riverside. He brought the wasps back from their native Pakistan and spent years studying them and doing environmental impact research to insure they wouldn't inadvertently harm other plants. California agreed they posed little environmental risk and releases began in 2011. The results seem promising but aren't a cure as the wasps slow but don't stop the spread of the encroaching psyllids.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/27/huanglongbing-citrus-disease-california-Orange Attorney-groves/1727857/

Insect could threaten California Orange Attorney groves

David Caples, Senior Vice President, Commercial Banking and Ms. Danni Remington, Senior Vice President, Business Banking Manager, will run the combined office. We are thrilled to bring our teams together, commented Ms. Remington, who also serves as Vice Chair of Membership for the Irvine Chamber of Commerce. The new location will give us a larger presence in Orange County, greatly assist our ability to serve our customers and enable us to make an even greater impact on the surrounding community. About CU Bancorp and California United Bank CU Bancorp is the parent of California United Bank which was founded in 2005 and is the largest independent bank headquartered in the San Fernando Valley. California United Bank provides a full range of financial services, including credit and deposit products, cash management, and internet banking to businesses, non-profits, entrepreneurs, professionals and investors throughout Southern California from offices in the San Fernando Valley, the Santa Clarita Valley, the Conejo Valley, Simi Valley, Los Angeles, South Bay, and Orange County. To view CU Bancorps most recent financial information, please visit the Investor Relations section of the Companys Web site.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://finance.yahoo.com/news/california-united-bank-opens-irvine-130500089.html

Law Suit Filed: Saxon Mortgage Faces Class Action Over Alleged Illegal Use of HAMP

Home > Lawsuits > Saxon Mortgage Faces Class Action Over Alleged Illegal Use of HAMP Saxon Mortgage Faces Class Action Over Alleged Illegal Use of HAMP April 7 2011 San Francisco, CA: Saxon Mortgage Inc, the mortgage service division of Morgan Stanley, is facing a a potential class action lawsuit alleging that the company uses the Homeowners Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) to attract customers into making "trial" payments on loans it has no intention of ever permanently modifying. Filed in Northern California, the suit, titled Gaudin v. Saxon Mortgage Services Inc, alleges a pattern of misconduct by Saxon of collecting trial payments, delaying the processing of loan modifications, and then denying the application altogether for demonstrably false reasons. According to the suit, Marie Gaudin, lead plaintiff and owner of a San Francisco bridal boutique that suffered hard times as a result of the recession brought on by the sub-prime mortgage crisis, asked Saxon for loan modification on her home. Gaudin was directed to Saxon's "Home Preservation Department" and subsequently asked to provide extensive documentation of her financial condition, which she did. She was assured by Saxon that they were "committed to assisting you in any way we can to complete the [the loan modification]. We want to help!" She received a written agreement from them that appeared to promise a permanent HAMP loan modification after she made three "trial" payments as proof she could handle the loan repayments. The complaint notes that Saxon instead delayed the processing of the HAMP loan modification, while urging Gaudin to continue making trial payments. However, after receiving numerous trial payments and fulfilling the rest of her obligations under the agreement Saxon denied her a permanent HAMP modification. They falsely claimed that Gaudin had failed to make payments or comply with document requests. Saxon's correspondence with Gaudin shows a pattern of inaccurate and irresponsible behavior on the part of a major global bank. The company claimed that she did not make payments, while in the same letter actually acknowledged that she was current on all payments. It also claimed that the U.S. Treasury Department was involved in reviewing HAMP applications. The class action alleges that Saxon's breach of contract, rescission and restitution, deceptive debt collection practices violated California's Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Rosenthal Act) and fraudulent, unlawful, and unfair business practices under California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL). Saxon Mortgage HAMP Class Action Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered damages in this case, please fill in the form to the right and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation. Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/saxon-mortgage-faces-class-action-illegal-use-of.html?ref=rss

Law Suit Filed: Fisker employment lawsuit

Home > Lawsuits > Fisker employment lawsuit Fisker Faces Employment Class Action Lawsuit Over WARN Act Violations April 9 2013 Houston, TX: An employment class action lawsuit has been filed against Fisker Automotive for failure to provide 60 days notice to employees who were part of recent mass layoffs. Those layoffs are in violation of US and California labor laws. Specifically, the US Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, a federal law, stipulates that companies with over 100 employees must provide 60 days notice prior to laying off their employees. There is also a similar requirement in place under California state law. The employment lawsuit against Fisker alleges the company failed to pay the employees their 60 days pay and benefits that they would have been received had they been provided their duly entitled 60-day notice. Further, the lawsuit claims Fisker failed to notify California's state Employment Development Department of its layoff plans, as well as the local workforce investment board, as well as the top elected officials in Anaheim and Orange County. Fisker Employment Class Action Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please fill in the form to the right and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation. Last updated April 9 2013 Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/Fisker-Employment-Class-Action-Lawsuit.html?ref=rss

Law Suit Filed: Nevada Foreclosure Companies Face Illegal Debt Collection Class Action

What are you looking for? Home Page >> Lawsuits Filed >> Lawsuit: Nevada Foreclosure Companies Face Illegal Debt Collection Class Action Nevada Foreclosure Companies Face Illegal Debt Collection Class Action Please click here for a free evaluation of your claim Las Vegas, NV: A foreclosure class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of 16 Nevadans against five companies hired by banks and lenders to handle the foreclosures on properties owned by the plaintiffs and one additional defendant who purchased property through the foreclosure process. The lawsuit claims illegal debt collection activities and deceptive trade practices by the defendants against the plaintiffs during the foreclosure process as the defendants were not licensed or registered in the State of Nevada to carry out the foreclosure process. The plaintiffs are Nevadans who not only lost their houses in one of the hardest hit real estate markets, but were also adversely affected by foreclosure companies that did not follow the law during the foreclosure process. The lawsuit names as defendants: Quality Loan Service Corporation; Appleton Properties, LLC; MTC Financial, Inc. dba Trustee Corps; Meridian Foreclosure Service dba MTDS, Inc. dba Meridian Trust Deed Service; National Default Servicing Corporation; and California Reconveyance Company. The lawsuit seeks to compensate the plaintiffs and compel the defendants to surrender all fees collected for many thousands of foreclosures during the time they were operating illegally. The case was filed as a class action lawsuit because there are thousands of potential plaintiffs who were victims of these foreclosure companies. The lawsuit alleges that the debt collection activities of the defendants are and/or were illegal and improper because each of the defendants did not hold a license to engage in debt collection activities in the State of Nevada and each also failed to register as a foreign debt collection agency with the Nevada Financial Institutions Division. The illegal and improper debt collection activities include the issuance of debt-related notices, demands, collection communications and/or foreclosure sales and processes. In addition, the plaintiffs also claim deceptive trade practices, consumer fraud, unjust enrichment, trespass, quiet title and in two instances, elder abuse. Plaintiffs are asking for compensatory and consequential damages in excess to $10,000, disgorgement of any amounts paid to defendants for their respective illegal and improper debt collection activities, attorney's fees and injunctive relief. Nevada Illegal Foreclosure Class Action Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered damages in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/nevada-foreclosure-companies-class-action-illegal.html?ref=rss

Law Suit Filed: Fisker employment lawsuit

Home > Lawsuits > Fisker employment lawsuit Fisker Faces Employment Class Action Lawsuit Over WARN Act Violations April 9 2013 Houston, TX: An employment class action lawsuit has been filed against Fisker Automotive for failure to provide 60 days notice to employees who were part of recent mass layoffs. Those layoffs are in violation of US and California labor laws. Specifically, the US Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, a federal law, stipulates that companies with over 100 employees must provide 60 days notice prior to laying off their employees. There is also a similar requirement in place under California state law. The employment lawsuit against Fisker alleges the company failed to pay the employees their 60 days pay and benefits that they would have been received had they been provided their duly entitled 60-day notice. Further, the lawsuit claims Fisker failed to notify California's state Employment Development Department of its layoff plans, as well as the local workforce investment board, as well as the top elected officials in Anaheim and Orange County. Fisker Employment Class Action Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please fill in the form to the right and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation. Last http://cortrightlaw.com/location/orange attorney-attorney-office updated April 9 2013 Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/Fisker-Employment-Class-Action-Lawsuit.html?ref=rss

California's main squeeze

Sell Used Car in Orange County California and Get Guaranteed Quotes in Minutes From Cash for Cars Quick

At some point, the Bono family's Orange Attorney -- along with most of the other stands -- was scrapped. Bono, a retired lawyer, took over the restaurant business after his mother died in the 1990s. More than 10 years ago, the Fontana Historical Society, of which Bono is a member, got word that a stand three miles east was going to be destroyed. The society moved it to a Wal-Mart parking lot, then Bono paid to have it moved to the parking area of Bono's Restaurant & Deli, where it still sits, restored but unused. That could change. Bono has been remodeling the restaurant, adding a wine bar, among other changes.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/03/local/la-me-Orange Attorney-stands3-2010mar03

Asian Buyers Buoy New-Home Demand in California's Orange

Interest in investment opportunities and second homes from buyers from Hong Kong and China has boosted purchases in Vancouver , Seattle , Californias Silicon Valley and Hawaii. In Orange County, Mei Zhou, 50, said she and her husband decided to buy a four-bedroom, four-bathroom house in Irvine , 40 miles southeast of Los Angeles -- a $1.2 million purchase last May -- because it was a good deal for a long-term investment. We didnt think of moving, but then I thought its a buyers market, said Zhou, whos originally from Shanghai and moved to http://cortrightlaw.com/location/Orange Attorney-attorney-office California 20 years ago. I definitely think I got a better deal than I would have a few years ago. Back in 2005, I think this house would have cost at least $1.4 million. New Home Co. opened Carmel at Woodbury, the Irvine development where Wang bought her house, in February 2010.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-13/asian-buyers-buoy-new-homes-in-california-s-Orange Attorney-county.html

UFC veteran Jason 'Mayhem' Miller arrested and held on $50,000 bond in Orange County, California

Times are tough, and many local residents find themselves lacking funds to pay bills, provide school tuitions, or even take a much needed vacation. However, Cash for Cars Quick is providing such people with a means by which they can get a good amount of cash within about an hour. By calling the nationwide buyer of used and junk autos, vehicle owners will receive guaranteed quotes for their unwanted vehicles in only minutes. Whats more, after deals are accepted, the guaranteed payments are rushed to the sellers in around an hours time. The fast service of the company is one of the main reasons it is so popular with used auto sellers in cities around the country. The company is consistently staying ahead of the competition by offering the most competitive price for all used cars and trucks. The automotive buying service uses the best local SEO company to spread this message across the search engines. Removal of non-running junk cars is also fast. When representatives of the cash for junk car Orange County office delivers the payments, they make arrangements with the sellers to haul the autos away by local towing companies in the companys network.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.sfgate.com/business/press-releases/article/Sell-Used-Car-in-Orange-County-California-and-Get-4747698.php

Ariel Helwani has tweeted that the popular former UFC fighter and MTV reality show host has been arrested again and is being held in the Orange County, California jail on a $50,000 bond. Here's the tweet: According to the Orange County Sheriff's Department, Jason Miller was arrested yesterday afternoon. Still in custody. Bail set @ $50k. ... Ariel Helwani (@arielhelwani) August 24, 2013 Miller was arrested on August 10 and charged with domestic violence. He was arrested in August 2012 and charged with burglary of a church.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2013/8/23/4652906/ufc-veteran-jason-mayhem-miller-arrested-50000-bond-Orange Attorney-county

14th Annual Elvis Festival

Fair & Event Center in Costa Mesa. The Elvis Festival is a full day tribute to the King of Rock and Roll from 10 a.m. 4 p.m., featuring three stages of Elvis Tribute Artists, ranging in ages 4 to 56; a King of Cadillacs Car Show; two hair contests: The Piled High Priscilla Hair Contest and Show more the Elevated Elvis Hair Contest; Creme de la King Elvis Singing Competition; Elvis Presley Fan Clubs: Jailhouse Rockers of California and All Shook Up from Nevada; memorabilia and collectibles including the newly released Mr. Potato Head Elvis Live Key Ring from PPW Toys through Elvis Presley Enterprises and Hasbro ; stilt Elvis and Priscilla, Abbit the Average Elvis; and King of Sundaes Ice Cream Eating Contest presented by Farrells Ice Cream Parlour.Two of the Elvi, Martin Anthony and Chris Luna, in a special featured show will perform as the Blues Brothers for their opening act, and each will later emerge as Elvis: Anthony doing a 50s and 60s tribute and Luna taking on the jumpsuit era.Gourmet food trucks will be serving up special menu items such as Bacon Manias The Elvis sandwich made of peanut butter, banana and white bread, wrapped in bacon and deep fried; Crepes Bonapartes Elvis crepe with peanut butter, bananas and bacon and Flavor Rushs The Kings Bacon Cheeseburger with ground beef, peanut butter, bacon and cheese!The Festival traditionally follows Elvis Week in Graceland, TN, which this year runs from August 10 - 17 honoring his life and music .Elvis Festival is held in conjunction with the weekend swap meet, which features nearly 1,000 merchants selling a variety of products and services. Hours are 7 a.m. to 4 p.m. All events at Elvis Festival are included in the price of admission to the swap meet, which is $2 for general, and free for children 12 and under. For more information on the Orange County Market Place and a complete schedule for Elvis Festival visit www.ocmarketplace.com or call (949)723-6660.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://events.ocregister.com/costa_mesa_ca/events/show/318587043-14th-annual-elvis-festival

Settlement: Bank of America Reaches $500M Settlement

Home > Settlements > Bank of America Reaches $500M Settlement Bank of America Reaches $500M Settlement April 17 2013 New York, NY: Bank of America has reached a settlement in the pending securities fraud class action lawsuit brought by investors who purchased mortgage investments from Countrywide Financial. BoFA acquired Countrywide in 2008. The proposed settlement would see BoFA pay $500 million to settle the lawsuit, which would be paid out to plaintiffs that include Dubai's Mashreq Bank and public and union pension funds in California, Maine, Nevada, Vermont and Washington states. http://cortrightlaw.com/location/orange-attorney-office The plaintiffs claimed they were misled about the risks of securities they bought from California-based Countrywide between 2005 and 2007. The settlement surpasses the $315 million accord reached with Merrill Lynch in May 2012, making it the largest to resolve federal class-action litigation over mortgage-backed securities since the financial crisis began. The accord requires court approval. Legal Help If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please click the link below. Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/bank-of-america-reaches-500m-settlement-countrywide.html?ref=rss

Settlement: Historic $10M Settlement Reached in Debt Collection Class Action

Home http://cortrightlaw.com/location/orange attorney-attorney-office > Settlements > Historic $10M Settlement Reached in Debt Collection Class Action Historic $10M Settlement Reached in Debt Collection Class Action September 12 2011 Greenville, SC: Thousands of people have been forgiven their debts in a historical unfair business class action settlement reached Friday in Maryland. The class action lawsuit was brought by Jason Hauk and Freddy Velazquez who led the class action suit, against LVNV Funding LLC, a Greenville, SC-based company that buys consumer debt. According to the terms of the settlement some 3,500 people in the class will receive about $2000 each, for a total of $7 million. The total settlement forgives about $10 million in debt, according to filings in U.S. District Court in Baltimore. Further, LVNV will not pursue the 3,500 debtors in order to collect the debt, nor will they be able to sell those debts to other third party collection agencies. And LVNV have to remove information it gave to the major credit bureaus for each of those debtors, a step taken to improve their credit ratings. The settlement is being hailed as historic, and a major win for the class. Legal Help If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please fill in the form to the right. Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/debt-collection-class-action-law.html?ref=rss

Law Suit Filed: Saxon Mortgage Faces Class Action Over Alleged Illegal Use of HAMP

Home > Lawsuits > Saxon Mortgage Faces Class Action Over Alleged Illegal Use of HAMP Saxon Mortgage Faces Class Action Over Alleged Illegal Use of HAMP April 7 2011 San Francisco, CA: Saxon Mortgage Inc, the mortgage service division of Morgan Stanley, is facing a a potential class action lawsuit alleging that the company uses the Homeowners Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) to attract customers into making "trial" payments on loans it has no intention of ever permanently modifying. Filed in Northern California, the suit, titled Gaudin v. Saxon Mortgage Services Inc, alleges a pattern of misconduct by Saxon of collecting trial payments, delaying the processing of loan modifications, and then denying the application altogether for demonstrably false reasons. According to the suit, Marie Gaudin, lead plaintiff and owner of a San Francisco bridal boutique that suffered hard times as a result of the recession brought on by the sub-prime mortgage crisis, asked Saxon for loan modification on her home. Gaudin was directed to Saxon's "Home Preservation Department" and subsequently asked to provide extensive documentation of her financial condition, which she did. She was assured by Saxon that they were "committed to assisting you in any way we can to complete the [the loan modification]. We want to help!" She received a written agreement from them that appeared to promise a permanent HAMP loan modification after she made three "trial" payments as proof she could handle the loan repayments. The complaint notes that Saxon instead delayed the processing of the HAMP loan modification, while urging Gaudin to continue making trial payments. However, after receiving numerous trial payments and fulfilling the rest of her visit the site obligations under the agreement Saxon denied her a permanent HAMP modification. They falsely claimed that Gaudin had failed to make payments or comply with document requests. Saxon's correspondence with Gaudin shows a pattern of inaccurate and irresponsible behavior on the part of a major global bank. The company claimed that she did not make payments, while in the same letter actually acknowledged that she was current on all payments. It also claimed that the U.S. Treasury Department was involved in reviewing HAMP applications. The class action alleges that Saxon's breach of contract, rescission and restitution, deceptive debt collection practices violated California's Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Rosenthal Act) and fraudulent, unlawful, and unfair business practices under California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL). Saxon Mortgage HAMP Class Action Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered damages in this case, please fill in the form to the right and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation. Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/saxon-mortgage-faces-class-action-illegal-use-of.html?ref=rss

Orange County Tummy Tuck Patients Have Access to a New Innovative Belly Button Technique, Announces Cruise Plastic Surgery

Orange County targets customers in fight against human trafficking

Newport Beach, CA. (PRWEB) August 20, 2013 Orange County tummy tuck patients seek out surgical options to correct any of the following issues following massive weight loss or child birth: loose skin, excess fat, stretch marks, and/or abdominal "pooch" below the navel. Most patients who have done their research frequently find a major flaw with the results they see following a tummy tuck. They notice how a patient's belly button no longer looks natural and the incision is visible around the outside. The most tell tale sign of a tummy tuck is the incision around the belly button. For this reason, I have spent a great deal of time figuring out a way to make the new belly button appear very natural, mentioned Dr. Cruise. For more information, please visit: http://Orange Attorneycountycosmeticsurgery.com/abdominoplasty/dr-cruises-philosophy/ . For most patients it is important to be able to wear any type of clothing they want, especially a bathing suit, without being concerned someone will see their belly button and notice they had something done. For this reason, Dr.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.seattlepi.com/business/press-releases/article/Orange-County-Tummy-Tuck-Patients-Have-Access-to-4746725.php

"In the past, we would just arrest girls for prostitution violations. We would bring them into our jail and issue them a citation and then send them right back out to the street," said Anaheim police Sgt. Craig Friesen. "We were part of a vicious cycle." With the passage of Proposition 35, prosecutors saw a chance to accelerate their efforts by creating a Human Exploitation and Trafficking unit, modeling it after one in Alameda County. The team, which includes an investigator and prosecutors, focuses exclusively on human trafficking cases. "Orange County is giving a clear message that not only are we not taking this from traffickers but we're not taking it from the buyers either. I love that," said D'Lita Miller, whose teenage daughter was a victim of sex trafficking and who works to help educate law enforcement about Proposition 35. U.S. Rep.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-human-trafficking-20130819,0,5560314.story

Asian Buyers Buoy New-Home Demand in California's Orange

Culturally speaking, Asians tend to have a much longer-term view than Americans do. They look at real estate as multigenerational, not short-term focused. Thats why they are making purchases during times when others may shy away. Boom and Bust Orange County, where Walt Disney built his first theme park and the teen television drama The O.C. took place, has close ties to the U.S. housing boom and bust. Firms including New Century Financial Corp. (NEW) and Ameriquest Mortgage Co., whose loose lending standards fueled the national real estate bubble, had their headquarters in the area before the subprime collapse. The unemployment rate in Orange County was 8 percent in January, less than the 10.9 percent figure for all of California and 8.3 percent for the U.S., according to the states Employment Development Department. The median household income in the county, home to 3 million people, was $74,344 as of 2010, more than the $60,883 median statewide, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-13/asian-buyers-buoy-new-homes-in-california-s-Orange Attorney-county.html

Orange County Plastic Surgeon Highlights Benefits of Gummy Bear Breast Implants

Feng Shui http://www.socallawsupport.com/ Good feng shui falls under good design principals, the way a cook top and sink are lined up with each other, McKibbin said. But with some buyers theres more focus on that. Thats when things like numerology come into place, which can place challenges in regards to addressing a home and avoiding certain numbers. We do pay attention to that. Standard Pacific last month reported a fourth-quarter profit of $15.3 million, compared with a year-earlier loss of $21.9 million, helped by a 44 percent net increase of new orders to 615. The company opened its Castillian development at Blackstone in Brea, in northern Orange County, in mid-March and sold 31 of the projects 38 units during the following nine months. The houses were priced at about $1 million each. Smaller design adjustments may also include solid, easy-to- clean surfaces in the kitchen, porcelain floors and streamlined contemporary designs, according to New Home Co.s Marcus-Colvin. Demand from Asian buyers has been specific to pockets in Orange County, while a broader, lasting recovery in Southern California is dependent on an economic rebound, said Sussman, the UCLA professor.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-03-13/asian-buyers-buoy-new-homes-in-california-s-Orange Attorney-county

Asian Buyers Buoy New-Home Demand in California's Orange

It comes in the wake of Texas Gov. Rick Perry's effort to lure business away from California. WEBSITE SCREEN GRAB Take that, Gov. Rick Perry! The website was in the works before the Texas governor's highly publicized ad campaign and his California visit aimed at poaching state businesses last month. But the timing of Orange County's effort highlights the intense competition among regions as the economy recovers from the recession. "Other states are romancing us," said Lucy Dunn, president and CEO of the business council. In the past few years, the council has organized "red teams" of public officials to persuade business owners who are considering a move to remain in Orange County.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.ocregister.com/articles/county-497799-Orange Attorney-california.html

O.C. business website aims to lure companies

Markets close in 5 hrs 11 mins Stock Watch BJ's Restaurants Opens in Orange, California Press Release: BJ's Restaurants, Inc. Tue, Jul 30, 2013 4:10 PM EDT 33.23 +0.35 HUNTINGTON BEACH, Calif., July 30, 2013 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- BJ's Restaurants, Inc. ( BJRI ) today announced the opening of its newest restaurant in Orange, California, on Monday, July 29, 2013. The new BJ's Restaurant & Brewhouse is located on a free standing pad at the 800,000 square foot Outlets of Orange premier shopping center in Orange County, California. The new restaurant is approximately 8,500 square feet, contains seating for approximately 280 guests and features BJ's extensive menu including BJ's signature deep-dish pizza, award-winning handcrafted beer and famous Pizookie(R) dessert. BJ's highly detailed, contemporary decor and unique video statement, including BJ's 103" plasma display as well as several high-definition flat panel televisions, creates a high energy, fun and family-friendly dining environment for everyone to enjoy. Hours of operation are from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight Sunday through Thursday, and 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://finance.yahoo.com/news/bjs-restaurants-opens-Orange Attorney-california-201000441.html

BJ's Restaurants Opens in Orange, California

Although he concludes by noting that "no one implant is perfect for every patient," he does say he believes gummy bear breast implants can be an excellent option for the right patient. According to Dr. Mills, the right patient for this fifth generation cohesive-gel implant is one whose "cosmetic goals align with the results these implants are designed to achieve." He says because of its highly-cohesive silicone gel composition (thicker than that of traditional silicone implants), gummy bear breast implants are typically able to better retain their shape and produce a more natural-looking aesthetic. For this reason, he adds that patients seeking more upper pole roundness or a much larger breast size are generally not the best candidates for this implant option. As a participant in the implant's FDA trials prior to their approval, the Orange County plastic surgeon notes that gummy bear implants can offer several advantages over saline and silicone implants for the ideal candidate. Some of these benefits include: A more natural look and feel A reduced risk of capsular contracture (buildupof scar tissue around the implant) A limited amount of silicone migration into thebody should a rupture occur The potential for the implant to last longer(which he estimates at 15-20 years) The ability to be inserted through the armpit(transaxillary) In the end, Dr.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Orange Attorney-county-plastic-surgeon-highlights-120500308.html

Law Suit Filed: Fisker employment lawsuit

Home > Lawsuits > Fisker employment lawsuit Fisker Faces Employment Class Action Lawsuit Over WARN Act Violations April 9 2013 Houston, TX: An employment class action lawsuit has been filed against Fisker Automotive for failure to provide 60 days notice to employees who were part of recent mass layoffs. Those layoffs are in violation of US and California labor laws. Specifically, the US Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, a federal law, stipulates that companies with over 100 employees must provide 60 days notice prior to laying off their employees. There is also a similar requirement in place under California state law. The employment lawsuit against Fisker alleges the company failed to pay the employees their 60 days pay and benefits that they would have been received had they been provided their duly entitled 60-day notice. Further, the lawsuit claims Fisker failed to notify California's state Employment Development Department of its layoff plans, as well as the local workforce investment board, as well as the top elected officials in Anaheim and Orange County. Fisker Employment Class Action Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please fill in the form to the right and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation. Last updated April 9 2013 Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/Fisker-Employment-Class-Action-Lawsuit.html?ref=rss

Law Suit Filed: Fisker employment lawsuit

Home > Lawsuits > Fisker employment lawsuit Fisker Faces Employment Class Action Lawsuit Over WARN Act Violations April 9 2013 Houston, TX: An employment class action lawsuit has been filed against Fisker Automotive for failure to provide 60 days notice to employees who were part of recent mass layoffs. Those layoffs are in violation of US and California labor laws. Specifically, the US Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, a federal law, stipulates that companies with over 100 employees must provide 60 days notice prior to laying off their employees. There is also a similar requirement in place under California state law. The employment lawsuit against Fisker alleges the company failed to pay the employees their 60 days pay and benefits that they would have been received had they been provided their duly entitled 60-day notice. Further, the lawsuit claims Fisker failed to notify California's state Employment Development Department of its layoff plans, as well as the local workforce investment board, as well as the top elected officials in Anaheim and Orange County. Fisker Employment Class Action Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please fill in the form to the right and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation. Last updated April 9 2013 Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/Fisker-Employment-Class-Action-Lawsuit.html?ref=rss

Law Suit Filed: JPMorgan Chase Accused of Fraud in Bankruptcy Filings

What are you looking for? Home Page >> Lawsuits Filed >> Lawsuit: JPMorgan http://www.socallawsupport.com/ Chase Accused of Fraud in Bankruptcy Filings JPMorgan Chase Accused of Fraud in Bankruptcy Filings Please click here for a free evaluation of your claim Newport Beach, CA: A consumer fraud class action filed against JPMorgan Chase alleges the bank routinely fabricated documents to deceive bankruptcy judges. The lawsuit, filed by Ernest Michael Bakenie, states "Through the use of fabricated assignments, endorsements and affidavits that purport to transfer deeds of trust, notes and the rights to all monies due under the terms of tens of thousands of non-negotiable promissory notes (the 'MLNs'); Chase has demonstrated a pattern and practice of playing 'hide-and-seek' with debtors, judges and other bankruptcy players." Bakenie further claims that Chase's "pattern and practice of playing 'hide-and-seek' with debtors, judges and other bankruptcy players" resulted in the bank securing motions for relief of stay and proofs of claim in 95 percent of its cases. According to the lawsuit, an extensive network of attorneys working for Chase filed more than 7,000 motions for relief from automatic stay in bankruptcy cases in the Central District of California, "wherein they falsely claim to be the party entitled to monies due under the terms of MLNs." The lawsuit also claims that Chase rewards attorneys based on how quickly they can secure the stays, and uses fabricated documents to establish chain of title on loans. Essentially, the lawsuit claims, "Rather than incur the cost of 'proving up' its own standing or the standing of its principal Mortgage Backed Security Trust, Chase systemically misrepresents Chase or a designated MBST to be a creditor in tens of thousands of bankruptcy cases by utilizing manufactured documents. " The lawsuit also claims "That said practice allows Chase to dump defaulted loans that were never properly securitized by Washington Mutual (WAMU) and other originators acquired by Chase into private mortgage backed security trusts by creating the illusion of a valid transfer. Said practice shifts the liability of defaulted loans not properly securitized by WAMU, from Chase to private mortgage backed security trusts. The practice allows Chase to effectively mitigate the millions of dollars in liability of the WAMU acquisition, where WAMU failed to transfer MLNs of its portfolio before its demise. Said practice shifts losses from WAMU to MBST bond investors." Bakenie seeks class certification, compensatory, statutory and punitive damages for unfair and deceptive trade, disgorgement and "an order vacating all bankruptcy orders, claims and awards granted based on Chase's misrepresentation and deceptive business practices". Chase Bankruptcy Fraud Class Action Legal Help If you or a loved one has suffered damages in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/jpmorgan-chase-fraud-bankruptcy-filings-lawsuit.html?ref=rss

Southbound 405 Freeway in Orange County reopens early

Orange and Anaheim, CA Gopher Control Now Available with 60-Day Guarantee

The southbound lanes of the 405 between the 605 and 22 freeways were reopened at 2:50 p.m., California Department of Transportation officials said. The closed northbound lanes at Valley View Street were still being cleared of debris and should open soon, officials said. Three police vehicles and a California Highway Patrol vehicle led the procession of cars on the reopened section of the freeway. The freeway closure enabled workers to demolish a 50-year-old connector bridge as part of a $277-million project to link carpool lanes for the 405, 22 and 605 freeways. The last section of the bridge was knocked down about 5:30 a.m. Sunday, broken up and hauled away. Dozens of steel plates placed on the freeway to protect it from 3,600 tons of falling concrete were then removed and the roadway inspected before it was reopened to traffic, officials said. The affected section of the 405 is one of the busiest stretches of road in the country.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-405-freeway-in-Orange Attorney-county-reopens-20130818,0,3828570.story

Orange County targets customers in fight against human trafficking

Instead of running away from the water, a high-school teacher from Laguna Niguel and his friend risked their lives to save the life of a young woman from Germany. Rick Moore was walking on the beach in Maui when he heard a woman's screams, and someone yelled "shark attack!" In spite of the danger, he jumped into the water. "Swam out there, and it was about 15 yards from her, I saw a young female with a bikini on, with blond hair, with a severed arm," said Moore. The 20-year-old woman had lost a lot blood and was nearly unconscious. "She was in and out of it, saying these words: 'I'm dying, I'm going to die,'" said Moore. "And I kept saying to her, 'No you're not, no you're not, we're going to get you to shore, we're going to save you." The 57-year-old teacher grabbed the woman and started swimming the 75 yards back to the shore, realizing that he too could be attacked by the shark. "I happened to be at the right place at the right time, swam out there, prayed over her, told her, 'Hey, let's see what we can do, see what God' going to do,'" said Moore.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?id=9209538

2 Orange County men rescue woman from shark attack in Maui

"If it is, we'll make healthy money. If it's not, that'll be unfortunate for everyone. But we believe we'll be successful." By launching the Long Beach Register, Kushner, publisher of the Register and CEO of Freedom Communications, is taking his contrarian instincts outside Orange County. Media business analyst Rick Edmonds said the last time he can recall a major U.S. city adding a new daily paper was around World War II, when Chicago got the Sun-Times and New York got Newsday. There have been scattered other instances in smaller cities, but since newspapers entered their recent troubles, the creation of a new rivalry is itself news. A brewing newspaper war in New Orleans between that city's Times-Picayune and a challenger based about 80 miles away in Baton Rouge, La., is the closest to what's unfolding in Long Beach. "How will it play out?" asked Edmonds, of the Poynter Institute, a journalism foundation in St.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/california-city-rarity-newspaper-town-20004428

Two Newspapers Set to Battle in Long Beach, California

(Mark Boster, Los Angeles Times / August 6, 2013) Also By Anh Do and Paloma Esquivel August 19, 2013, 5:00 a.m. A 24-year-old Anaheim man accused of teaching a teenage girl to work as a prostitute, advertising her services on an X-rated website. A 19-year-old guy charged with forcing a stable of girls to walk Beach Boulevard, not far from Disneyland, and perform sex acts for money. A middle-aged Irvine woman accused of operating a brothel in an upscale apartment complex. Since tougher human-trafficking laws went on the books in January, officials across California have sharpened their focus, going after pimps who force women often young runaways or girls lured by Internet postings to sell their bodies. Orange County prosecutors are targeting their customers as well. The names of men picked up on suspicion of soliciting sex have been publicized on the district attorney's website, along with detailed descriptions of alleged pimps' arrests, and stories of women being beaten, raped and virtually enslaved as prostitutes. http://www.socallawsupport.com/ When he announced the get-tough approach at a rally earlier this year, Dist. Atty.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-human-trafficking-20130819,0,5560314.story

The competition is the Long Beach Press-Telegram, founded more than a century ago. As a result of the budding newspaper battle, this city of 468,000 is joining the likes of Chicago, Philadelphia and Boston as what has become a rarity in 21st century America the two newspaper town. Never mind shrinking circulations and online news migration. We believe that a city with the size and vibrancy of Long Beach should be happy to support a great newspaper of the variety we want to provide, said Aaron Kushner, who since buying the Orange County Register a year ago with a partner has surprised industry watchers by expanding reporting staff and page counts. If it is, well make healthy money. If its not, thatll be unfortunate for everyone.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/252370-2-newspapers-set-to-battle-in-long-beach-california/

California City Becomes Rarity: a 2 Newspaper Town

This makes it the longest guarantee for gopher and mole pest control service in Southern California. Rodent Guys is licensed by the State of California and insured for performing pest control services in Anaheim and Orange, CA. For more information about Rodent Guys Gopher Extermination Service for Anaheim and Orange, California, visit their website at http://www.rodentguys.com or call them at 866-931-1287 for Los Angeles, Ventura, San Bernardino, Orange and Riverside Counties. Rodent Guys services most of Los Angeles area including Los Angeles, Sunland, Calabasas, Pasadena, Long Beach, Azusa, Studio City, West Los Angeles, El Segundo, North Hills, Pacific Palisades, Santa Monica, South Bay, Venice, Westchester, West Hollywood, Sherman Oaks, Encino, Arcadia, Monrovia, Bradbury, Duarte, Irwindale, Glendora, La Verne, San Dimas, Walnut, Diamond Bar, Claremont, Whittier, Hacienda Heights, La Mirada, Malibu, Santa Monica, El Monte, Alhambra, Temple City, San Marino, La Canada, Altadena, South Pasadena, Covina, West Covina, Pico Rivera, Pomona, Sierra Madre, La Crescenta, Montrose, Tujunga, Mission Hills, Playa Del Rey, Beverly Hills, Brentwood, Bel Air, Hollywood, West Hollywood, North Hollywood, Burbank, Glendale, Van Nuys, Simi Valley, Woodland Hills, North Hills, Chatsworth, San Fernando, Northridge, Reseda, Monterey Park, Rosemead, La Mirada, Sante Fe Springs, Norwalk, Bellflower, Downey, Lakewood, Cerritos, Marina Del Rey, Rowland Heights, Montebello, Carson, Compton, Lynwood, Inglewood, Culver City, and surrounding cities. All of Orange County is serviced for gopher control including Aliso Viejo, Anaheim, Brea, Buena Park, Costa Mesa, Cypress, Dana Point, Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, Irvine, La Habra, La Palma, Laguna Beach, Laguna Hills, Laguna Nigel, Laguna Woods, Lake Forest, Los Alamitos, Mission Viejo, Newport Beach, Orange, Placentia, Rancho Santa Margarita, San Clemente, San Juan Capistrano, Santa Ana, Seal Beach, Stanton, Tustin, Villa Park, Westminster, Yorba Linda. Riverside county gopher removal for Riverside, Corona, Jurupa Valley, Canyon Lake, Lake Elsinore, Lake Mathews, Eastvale, Moreno Valley, Norco and down to Murrieta are also serviced.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/13/08/p3846786/Orange Attorney-and-anaheim-ca-gopher-control-now-available-with-60-day-guarante

Settlement: Banner Supply Agrees to Pay $54.4 Million in Chinese Drywall Class Action

Home > Settlements > Banner Supply Agrees to Pay $54.4 Million in Chinese Drywall Class Action Banner Supply Agrees to Pay $54.4 Million in Chinese Drywall Class Action June 15 2011 Miami, FL: A $54.4 Million settlement has been reached in a Chinese drywall lawsuit brought againt Banner Supply by homeowners in the Orlando area. The agreement covers 2,000 to 3,000 homes south of Orlando. Some 7 million sheets of tainted drywall were imported from China between 2000 and 2009, according to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, most of which was supplied folllowing the devastating Hurricanes Rita and Katrina. According to Builderonline "at least 95 companies have been implicated as distributors in lawsuits filed against Chinese manufacturers accused of being the source of tainted drywall. Banner Supply tops the list, while others on it include such ProSales 100 companies as L&W Supply, ProBuild, Stock Building Supply, and 84 Lumber. " While $54.5 million might seem a large settlement, it reportedly works out to between $18,000 and $24,000 for each of the 2,000 to 3,000 homes, however there are estimates which suggest the cost of repairing the affected homes could be as much as $100,000. Legal Help If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please fill in the form to the right. Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/banner-supply-agrees-to-pay-54-4-million-in-chinese.html?ref=rss

Settlement: Bank of America Reaches $500M Settlement

Home > Settlements > Bank of America Reaches $500M Settlement Bank of America Reaches $500M Settlement April 17 2013 New York, NY: Bank of America has reached a settlement in the pending securities fraud class action lawsuit brought by investors who purchased mortgage investments from Countrywide Financial. BoFA acquired Countrywide in 2008. The proposed settlement would see BoFA pay $500 million to settle the lawsuit, which would be paid out to plaintiffs that include Dubai's Mashreq Bank and public and union pension funds in California, Maine, Nevada, Vermont and site web Washington states. The plaintiffs claimed they were misled about the risks of securities they bought from California-based Countrywide between 2005 and 2007. The settlement surpasses the $315 million accord reached with Merrill Lynch in May 2012, making it the largest to resolve federal class-action litigation over mortgage-backed securities since the financial crisis began. The accord requires court approval. Legal Help If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please click the link below. Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/bank-of-america-reaches-500m-settlement-countrywide.html?ref=rss

Settlement: Wells Fargo Ordered to Pay $203M in Overdraft Fees Class Action Settlement

Home > Settlements > Wells Fargo Ordered to Pay $203M in Overdraft Fees Class Action Settlement Wells Fargo Ordered to Pay $203M in Overdraft Fees Class Action Settlement May 16 2013 San Francisco, CA: US District Judge William Alsup has issued an order to reinstate a $203 million judgment against Wells Fargo Bank. The judgment is based upon the court's findings, as affirmed on appeal by the Ninth Circuit, that Wells Fargo violated California's unfair competition law by deceiving its customers that debit card purchases would be posted chronologically to their accounts when in fact Wells Fargo posted them in a high-to-low order for the sole purpose of generating overdraft fees. The case before Judge Alsup was brought on behalf of California Wells Fargo customers who, from November 15, 2004 to June 30, 2008, incurred overdraft fees on debit card transactions as a result of the bank's practice of sequencing transactions from highest to lowest. On August 10, 2010, Judge Alsup issued a 90-page opinion finding that Wells Fargo manipulated its processing of customer debit card purchases by its California customers, and made misleading statements to consumers regarding is resequencing practice, to maximize overdraft fees in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law. This practice had the greatest impact on the bank's low income customers because their accounts often had the smallest balances. As noted above, instead of posting transaction chronologically, Wells Fargo deducted the largest charges first, drawing down available balances more rapidly and triggering a higher volume of overdraft fees. Judge Alsup ordered that Wells Fargo return to its customers approximately $203 million in restitution and enjoined the abusive accounting practices. Judge Alsup's August 10, 2010, decision followed two and half years of extended litigation that culminated in a two-week bench trial which ended in May 2010. On September 9, 2010, Wells Fargo filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On December 26, 2012, the appellate court issued an opinion upholding and reversing portions of Judge Alsup's order, and remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings. The appellate court found the National Bank Act preempted application of state law to Wells Fargo's decision to use high-to-low posting. Importantly, the appellate court also found that false and misleading statements by Wells Fargo were not preempted and the bank could be held liable for affirmative misrepresentations in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law. In his decision, Judge Alsup reinstated the judgment against Wells Fargo, finding: "This order is not penalizing Wells Fargo for a practice protected by federal preemption. Instead, it is penalizing Wells Fargo for affirmatively misleading the class as to what the practice was, namely engaging in a practice likely to mislead the class to believe that processing would be done in chronological order when, in fact, processing was done in high-to-low, non-chronological order." Overdraft Fees Legal Help If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please fill in the form to the right. Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/wells-fargo-203m-overdraft-fees-class-action.html?ref=rss

Settlement: Bank of America Reaches $500M Settlement

Home > Settlements > Bank of America Reaches $500M Settlement Bank of America Reaches $500M Settlement April 17 2013 New York, NY: Bank of America has reached a settlement in the pending securities fraud class action lawsuit brought by investors who purchased mortgage investments from Countrywide Financial. BoFA acquired Countrywide in 2008. The proposed settlement would see BoFA pay $500 million to settle the lawsuit, which would be paid out to plaintiffs that include Dubai's Mashreq Bank and public and union pension funds in California, Maine, Nevada, Vermont and Washington states. The plaintiffs claimed they were misled about the risks of securities they bought from California-based Countrywide between 2005 and 2007. The settlement surpasses the $315 million accord reached with Merrill Lynch in May 2012, making it the largest to resolve federal class-action litigation over mortgage-backed securities since the financial crisis began. The accord requires court approval. Legal Help If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please click the link below. Request Legal Help
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/bank-of-america-reaches-500m-settlement-countrywide.html?ref=rss

Oprah No Match For Orange County Housewives On ‘Watch What Happens Live’

Orange County Pain Management Clinic, Integrated Health, Now Offering Over 25 Effective Chronic Pain Treatments

But its no match for the 1.213 million who tuned in on July 29th, the 1.18 million who came on Aug. 5, or the 1.006 million on Aug. 12. On each of those nights, one or both of Cohens guests was a cast member of Bravos flagship reality series, Real Housewives of Orange County. While maybe no match for a scenery-chewing Orange County housewife, Oprah is formidable at the weekend boxoffice, reports Deadlines Nikki Finke, who notes that based on early trends, The Butler is looking to be the biggest grossing film for the weekend, with 72% of Fandangos surveyed The Butler ticket-buyers saying Winfreys involvement increased their interest in the film. During her WWHL visit, Cohen asked O whether her new film role was tougher than the one shed played in Steven SpielbergsThe Color Purple.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.deadline.com/2013/08/oprah-no-match-for-Orange Attorney-county-housewives-on-watch-what-happens-live/

Orange County Housing Ranked Highest Overvalue

TCS declined to comment on the issue, citing it as a legal matter. The issue relates to a contract for development of a tax collection and management system for Orange County in 2007-2008. TCS won the bid for the job for an amount of about $8 million. The county also accused TCS of delays and cost over-runs in a software project. Reuters According to the contract, Tata America International Corporation (TCS America) was to develop and implement the Property Tax Management System Project for Orange County. The lawsuit was filed in April this year in the California Central District Court, people with knowledge ofthe development said. It alleges that TCS made a series of false promises and intentional misrepresentations during the bidding process and made promises to complete the project on a budget and according to a timeline with which they had no intention of complying. The lawsuit further claims: The county has suffered millions of dollars of damages as a result of defendants wrongful conduct and it will continue to suffer damages for the years it will take to develop a replacement for the failed project. When contacted, a TCS spokesperson said: As a matter of policy we dont discuss pending legal matters.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.firstpost.com/business/Orange Attorney-county-drags-tcs-to-court-for-making-false-promises-1037431.html

2 Orange County men rescue woman from shark attack in Maui

Anguizola is a highly skilled Orange County pain management doctor with Triple Board Certification. By having such a broad skill set, he is able to offer extensive medication management and over 25 options for interventional pain procedures. The options allow him to customize treatment for each patient. Since each pain patient has a unique presentation, each one deserves individualized treatment for the best outcomes. Over 25 insurance plans are accepted at Integrated Health Services including Medicare, PPO's, Worker's Compensation, Personal Injury and self pay too. There are four clinic locations in Santa Ana, Long Beach, Pomona and Arcadia. Dr. Anguizola treats individuals with both simple and complicated problems.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.sfgate.com/business/press-releases/article/Orange-County-Pain-Management-Clinic-Integrated-4738008.php

405 Freeway in Orange County to close for bridge demolition

The 20-year-old woman had lost a lot blood and was nearly unconscious. "She was in and out of it, saying these words: 'I'm dying, I'm going to die,'" said Moore. "And I kept saying to her, 'No you're not, no you're not, we're going to get you to shore, we're going to save you." The 57-year-old teacher grabbed the woman and started swimming the 75 yards back to the shore, realizing that he too could be attacked by the shark. "I happened to be at the Orange Attorney right place at the right time, swam out there, prayed over her, told her, 'Hey, let's see what we can do, see what God' going to do,'" said Moore. While someone on the beach called rescuers, Moore's friend Nick Grisaffi jumped in to help. "I could see he was fighting the current and so I went out about neck-deep water," said Grisaffi. "As soon as he got to me, I was able to grab his arm and he was able to still hold onto her, and I pulled them up to waist-deep water, and that's when I picked her up." "There's no way she could have swam back with that current," said Moore. "She was so far out with the loss of her limb, blood, there was absolutely no way she would have been alive." Other beachgoers joined the rescue, using a kayak to carry the woman up a trail. Moore performed CPR until an emergency medical crew arrived.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local/Orange Attorney_county&id=9209538

The 405 Freeway will be closed between the 605 Freeway and Valley View Street from 9 p.m. Saturday to 5 p.m. Sunday. The new southbound 405 connector bridge to the eastbound 22 is already in use, so crews will be demolishing the old bridge. The work is being dubbed "Bridge Bash" or "Orange Jam." Orange County officials expect a lot of congestion in the area over the weekend. Approximately 350,000 drivers use that stretch of the 405 on a typical weekend day. This work is part of the $277 million West County Connectors project.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local/orange_county&id=9208497

Orange County drags TCS to court for 'making false promises'

More people are finding employment but more importantly, it seems our once crashed housing market is back in business. With positive reports coming in every month, it seems local housing is being criticized for going too fast. The most recent reports have the housing market at a 7% increase and building and construction permits showed an increase of 6%. According to a study done by research real estate website, Trulia.com , Orange County has the highest overvalued housing in the entire country. The study rated Orange County homes to be around 12% more expensive than the current housing value. Not far behind Orange County was Los Angeles at 10% and Austin, TX at 9% overvalued. In a statement from Trulias Chief Economist Jed Kolko and author of the report, Kolko explains that although Orange County and Los Angles Counties are the most overvalued in the current market, they are more true to a long term value.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.examiner.com/article/Orange Attorney-county-housing-ranked-highest-overvalue